• Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Christian persecution increased during Musharraf's rule
Written by Sheraz Khurram Khan   
Wednesday, 20 August 2008

PAKISTAN (ANS) -- Joseph Francis, the National Director of Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS) has said that Christian persecution and discrimination with minorities surged during former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf’s rule.

Francis said that the Christians of Pakistan suffered enormous injustices, discrimination and persecution during Musharraf’s rule.

“Christians were not immune from persecution and raw treatment during the tenure of Presidents that preceded Musharraf, but the scale of Christian persecution was worst during Musharraf’s rule,” said Francis.

Francis put forward statistics of Christian persecution during Musharraf’s rule. He claimed that over 55 churches were attacked and maintained that 58 Christians were murdered while 275 were wounded. Pointing to the misuse of Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy laws, Francis said that 212 blasphemy cases were registered from October 12, 1999 to August 18, 2008.

He said that some 10 blasphemy-accused had been killed extra-judicially during Musharraf’s stint as President. Among the victims of blasphemy-related extra-judicial killings, he said four of them were Christians while the rest were Muslims.

Musharraf’s popularity plummeted when he sacked Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry on March 9, 2007. The President’s move of seizing emergency powers on November 3, 2007 further dented his popularity. The President made frequent promises on shedding his military uniform but he did not deliver on them. He took off his military uniform after coming under intense international pressure. The victory of Musharraf’s opponents on February 18, 2008 elections proved to be the last nail in Musharraf’s coffin.

Calls for Musharraf to quit from president’s office became strident two weeks ago, culminating at the decision of the ruling coalition to impeach president Musharraf if he did not resign. Musharraf resigned from the office of President on August 18 to avoid impeachment turmoil.

Mr. Joseph Francis said that Pervez Musharraf should have resigned way earlier than August 18 when he had started becoming unpopular with people of Pakistan.

Disputing former Pakistani President Musharraf’s claim that he had empowered Pakistani minorities, Francis said minorities on the contrary were discriminated against during President Musharraf’s rule.

He criticized Musharraf for introducing a host of constitutional amendments to prolong his rule. How the former President could justify his claim of empowering minorities when he did not even institute a single constitutional amendment to bring minorities at par with majority, he argued.

“Our Personal Laws continue to be violated,” he said. “No amendment has been made in Minorities Personal Laws including Marriage Act, Divorce Act and Inheritance Act during former the President’s rule.”

He also slammed Pervez Musharraf for not heeding to Pakistan National Christian Party’s demand of amending article 41 of the constitution of Pakistan which he stated says, “A person shall not be qualified for election as President unless he is a Muslim of not less than forty-five years of age and is qualified to be elected as member of the National Assembly.”

http://www.assistnews.net/Stories/2008/s08080122.htm

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 20 August 2008 )
 
Citizen border crossings tracked and recorded
Written by Ellen Nakashima for the Washington Post   
Wednesday, 20 August 2008

Editor's Note:  Observe the last sentence of the third from the last paragraph before the link:  "By June, all travelers crossing land borders will need to present a machine-readable document, such as a passport or a driver's license with a radio frequency identification chip."  Our federal government seems to want to increase its ability to monitor the actions of our own citizens.  Now if we could get them to do that with terrorists and illegal aliens.

The federal government has been using its system of border checkpoints to greatly expand a database on travelers entering the country by collecting information on all U.S. citizens crossing by land, compiling data that will be stored for 15 years and may be used in criminal and intelligence investigations.

Officials say the Border Crossing Information system, disclosed last month by the Department of Homeland Security in a Federal Register notice, is part of a broader effort to guard against terrorist threats. It also reflects the growing number of government systems containing personal information on Americans that can be shared for a broad range of law enforcement and intelligence purposes, some of which are exempt from some Privacy Act protections.

While international air passenger data has long been captured this way, Customs and Border Protection agents only this year began to log the arrivals of all U.S. citizens across land borders, through which about three-quarters of border entries occur.

The volume of people entering the country by land prevented compiling such a database until recently. But the advent of machine-readable identification documents, which the government mandates eventually for everyone crossing the border, has made gathering the information more feasible. By June, all travelers crossing land borders will need to present a machine-readable document, such as a passport or a driver's license with a radio frequency identification chip.

In January, border agents began manually entering into the database the personal information of travelers who did not have such documents.

The disclosure of the database is among a series of notices, officials say, to make DHS's data gathering more transparent. Critics say the moves exemplify efforts by the Bush administration in its final months to cement an unprecedented expansion of data gathering for national security and intelligence purposes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/19/AR2008081902811.html?hpid=topnews

 
Philippine peace deal to be reworked
Written by Jim Gomez   
Wednesday, 20 August 2008

KAUSWAGAN, Philippines (AP) — The Philippine peace process was thrown into disarray Wednesday, with the government saying a proposed deal with Muslim rebels must be renegotiated after the guerrillas shot or hacked 37 people to death in a brutal rampage.

The announcement came as the peace process with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front already appeared to be unraveling after Monday's rampage, which also led 44,000 people to flee their homes in southern Lanao del Norte province.

After years of tough Malaysian-brokered negotiations, the Philippine government and the rebel front forged an accord last month that calls for the expansion of an existing Muslim autonomous region in the country's troubled south, homeland of minority Muslims and scene of decades-long Muslim separatist rebellions.

Under the accord, more than 700 villages will be added to the Muslim region, fueling protests from majority Christian politicians, some of whom asked the Supreme Court to stop its signing in Malaysia. Other opponents say the accord was unconstitutional because it would carve a separate Islamic state from the country.

The Supreme Court stopped its scheduled signing while it looked into the petitions. Rebel leaders said they did not sanction Monday's attacks, adding the guerrillas were apparently upset by the court's decision.

Press Secretary Jesus Dureza said the government was concerned that the rebel leadership may not be able to control all their forces and such attacks could be repeated.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hDjAO5PfeMIOJxfzDTvrm4AKqkwQD92M1AKG0

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 4 of 50

Time and Date

Sponsored Links

Polls

Will Pakistani President Musharraf's resignation hurt or harm U. S. foreign policy?
 

Who's Online

RocketTheme Joomla Templates